The CMS Catch-22
Friday, November 17th, 2006What’s the point of a CMS? I’ve really been trying to figure that out, because here is the usual pattern for CMS users:
- Company X Wants a web site.
- Company X looks to hire a web developer/designer. In-house people who know the web would be perfect.
- Said designer is “too expensive”.
- Company X finds CMS XYZ, which is only a few grand, spent only once to implement.
- XYZ is purchased, because it allows everyone to share the load, without knowing HTML.
- XYZ is deployed, and there is much rejoicing.
- X uses XYZ for a time, but becomes more web savvy.
- XYZ is found to be missing some nifty features that X wants, and non-HTML knowing staff members step it up.
- The non-HTML knowing staff gets tired of trying to make updates. By this time, they all know basic HTML.
- XYZ is labelled internally as inflexible, and the new guy gets assigned to do all of the updates.
- Back in his lair, the the vendor for XYZ counts his gold pieces.
- X gets tired of the inflexibility of XYZ. Even though they’ve sunk in some cash for upgrades, they drop XYZ.
- Said designer is hired, and the corporate site is fresh, nimble, and flexible.
Yeah, so maybe I’m biased, but there really is no reason for a large corporation to have a CMS. Ever. Maybe they have some sort of twisted point existing as training wheels for smaller organizations, but I don’t think I’ve seen many succeed.
When is the last time you heard someone talk highly of the CMS running the company website?
